"We Need Someone Like Michelle Rhee" proclaims an editorial headline in the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo . Apparently, the D.C. Chancellor of Schools is playing an inspirational role in the upcoming election for Seoul's superintendent of education. Particularly noteworthy: her innovative merit pay scheme, her consolidation of schools, her shake up of school leaders, and, of course, rising test scores.

While the editorial does not support one candidate in particular, it does take the time to speak out against the candidate on the "leftwing" (their word, not mine) Korean Teachers and Education Workers' Union ticket. Specifically, this candidate argues against school choice and publishing academic achievement levels. The editors explain:

But in order to save our schools from being carried away by efforts to make all schools uniform and face lowered education standards in the process, we must let students and parents choose which high schools they want to attend and promote competition among teachers by letting everyone know which schools excel and which lag behind.


Chosun Ilbo covered Rhee's reforms in more depth yesterday ....

A??new "quick review" out of the What Works Clearinghouse finds that Teach for America teachers

improved student performance on standardized end-of-course tests in math and science-by about one-tenth of a standard deviation. This is equivalent to moving a student from the 50th to the 54th percentile.??

Simply put, more good news for the program. Find the WWC caveats and the review, based on a 2007 CALDER study, here.

Liam Julian

He's supposed to get into the details when he speaks to the NAACP tomorrow, but John McCain didn't leave education out of his speech to the National Council of La Raza yesterday. From the Los Angeles Times :

Calling education "the civil rights issue of our time," McCain noted that half of Latinos entering high school did not graduate, and praised La Raza for its work in helping establish 100 charter schools. "In the global economy," he said, "what you learn is what you earn."

Clint Bolick writes in the Wall Street Journal that McCain should make his, McCain's,??support of educational choice more of an issue.

Gadfly Studios

Just days after Fordham Institute president Checker Finn wrote in the Education Gadfly that "nobody I know under 30 much bothers either with newspapers or radio/TV news," evidence of intelligent, newsprint-scouring life under 30 has been documented (below) in his own offices. In an amazing coincidence, the young blonde woman in the video, whose cherubic features leave no doubt as to her post-disco birth date, is believed to be an employee of Dr. Finn's organization.

The Washington Post reports that Maryland has shown huge gains in test scores, particularly among disadvantaged students, though the usual doubts about dumbing-down abound. Fordham's own study of state test cut-scores suggests such skepticism is warranted.

According to the Montgomery Advertiser, Alabama has announced a revolution in higher education: It's going to make sure that fake for-profit institutions of higher ed are no longer skipping town with students' tuition money. Apparently, an overwhelmed Department of Postsecondary Education has been unable to adequately regulate private colleges in the state, allowing phony schools to set up shop in the great state of the Southern Longleaf Pine and sell degrees willy-nilly. The new safeguards are overwhelmingly brilliant:

Proving that they're not diploma mills will mean doing things they've never had to do before such as producing audited financial statements, federal and state tax returns, requiring owners to have good reputations and adopting a definition of academic fraud.

However did they think of all these great ideas? To Alabama's credit, the Associated Press gives a slightly clearer (and less guffaw-inducing) take on the situation. And perhaps we should give the poor Department of Postsecondary Education a break since, according to the Montgomery Advertiser, it has only a "two and a half-person staff."

...What is a half-person?...

Liam Julian

On steamy summer days such as this one, when the education news is reduced to a trickle, one must seek other sources by which to slake his eduthirst. The Harvard Educational Review arrived last week in the mail, and today I decided to read it.

My first selection was "The New Outspoken Atheism and Education" by Nel Noddings, who Wikipedia tells me "is an American feminist, educationalist, and philosopher best known for her work in philosophy of education, educational theory, and ethics of care." Undaunted by this description, I forge ahead, letting the beneficence of doubt be my guide, and run smack into this first sentence: "We live in an age of great contradictions."

That is true, insofar as it has been true of every "age" in which humankind has lived. But why the compulsion to note such a self-evident thing at the start of an essay that ostensibly hopes to address the topics of atheism and education?

I further forge and encounter, beyond the dubious introductory line, what is meant to be evidence bolstering it. "On the one hand," Noddings tells us (and you can bet there's an other hand where that one came from), "religion...

Liam Julian

Randi Weingarten, soon to be the head of the American Federation of Teachers, would have us believe that the ideas she proposes as fixes to k-12 public education are new. According to the New York Times, Weingarten "wants to replace President Bush's focus on standardized testing with a vision of public schools as community centers that help poor students succeed by offering not only solid classroom lessons but also medical and other services." One portion of??a speech to be delivered today by Weingarten at the AFT convention reads, "Sisters and brothers, this is an idea whose time has come." But isn't this actually an idea whose time has passed, an idea whose time yielded no noticeable gains in student achievement???

What does Richard??Kahlenberg think? ???My sense is that Randi Weingarten is continuing Al Shanker's tradition, clearly standing up for the interests of teachers but also trying to engage in thoughtful education reform that will be good for students."??After uttering which quote??Kahlenberg hung up the telephone and resumed work on his forthcoming op-ed??detailing how??Al Shanker would never have??allowed Fannie Mae and??Freddie Mac to borrow from the discount window....

Columnist Jay Mathews writes in today's Washington Post about Fordham's latest report, High-Achieving Students in the Era of No Child Left Behind.

Here's a teaser:

My theory is that we have unconsciously taken our concern about the income gap--a lively issue in the last several years--and adopted the same vocabulary when we worry about how our children are doing in school, even though making money and learning to read, write and do math are different enterprises. I can understand distaste for people who build 50-room mansions with gold bathroom fixtures. But can anyone learn too much? Wisdom tends to help everyone who comes in contact with it. Ski chalets in Aspen are less useful to those of us who can't afford them.

Fun factoid of the day: Neither the ACT nor the College Board/ETS (giver of the SAT) tells colleges or universities why they cancel student scores. Joe Shmoe faints during a test? Joe Shmoe has his pal Freddy take the test for him? All the same in the testing companies' eyes. They'll cancel the score and let the student take the test again. And this is how they might explain it (as ACT recently did to UCLA):

The ACT cancels scores for a variety of reasons, including illness of the examinee, mis-timing of the test, disturbances or irregularity at the testing site.... It is the ACT policy to treat the ACT's reasoning for canceling a specific score as confidential.

Even in cases where cheating is suspected, as described in today's Los Angeles Times, the testing company investigates students directly--but doesn't tell the high school or college that Joe has run quite the scam.

It seems to me that, although sponsored by external organizations, college entrance exams are inextricably linked to high schools and universities alike. Their value has come into question as some institutions no longer require the scores, but for many students the SAT/ACT remains a...