Did you know the Flypaper bloggers do other stuff during the day, in addition to blogging? We do. Ed policy research, charter sponsorship in Ohio, the weekly Education Gadfly newsletter, and more. You can see it all at the Fordham Institute website,, which has just received a handsome makeover.


SUBJECT: Asteroids!

Dear Roy,

Hey, how's it going? I see you were in Colorado yesterday; I guess Ed in 08's lawyers gave up trying to keep the initiative out of politics, eh?

But that's not why I'm writing. Look, I'm a little upset that you haven't taken my advice from a few weeks ago to heart. I see that your team is still using the "economics" argument to promote education reform. That's all wrong. Like I told you, those pocketbook issues are too fickle. The economy goes down but it also goes up.

What's not going away is the threat of an asteroid hitting the Earth and ending life as we know it. But here's the good news: just as I predicted, some good ole American students hold the key to saving the world. Check this out: American Fork students on asteroid watch. Get a load of this:

The 34 students on science teacher Curtis Craig's "Caveman team" of the Killer Astroid Project arrive to upload their star-measuring software and

Liam Julian

It's on. And with ESPN360, you don't have to miss a moment. A moment like this.

Update: Or this!

Liam Julian

We've documented how Wake County (Raleigh) is making a real mess of its public schools. (See here , here , here , and there's more where that came from, too.) Just a few weeks ago we noted that the district's school board--by taking to court parents who don't want their children to attend year-round schools--was acting in a way that will only alienate and offend its customers.

Now, we learn, the board has been forced to reverse its decision :

The board took this action in response to a state Supreme Court action last week that blocked a Court of Appeals ruling that eliminated the need for parental consent to send children to year-round and modified-calendar schools.

Liam Julian

Books like this are fine, but it's incorrect (title of book in question notwithstanding) to see them as diagnosing a "national problem." The temptation exists, of course, to find in their stories reflections of a country in which high school students don't eat lunch (no time!), in which parents will not remove themselves from their children's sides, in which kids are coddled and pampered and showered with gold stars for the straight-A's they receive. But what really ail U.S. youth are not the products of too much parental involvement, but the products of not enough parental involvement--more specifically, not enough solid guidance from adults (teachers, coaches, mentors, etc.).

The reviewer??makes another smart point:

...even as parents obsessively strap bike helmets on their kids' heads and squirt antiseptic gels on their hands, the adults themselves cavalierly break up families with divorce and tolerate the rampant sexualization of prepubescent girls. In short, we're focusing on the wrong risks.

True. What most worries me, though: Did they really wrap up that kid in yellow caution tape?

Liam Julian

Reports the BBC: "A university has asked students to refrain from throwing their mortar board hats in the air to celebrate graduation in case someone gets hurt."

Smart. Hat-related injuries can and do occur.

Wondering why all that extra federal money for "teacher quality" just seems to get absorbed by the system? Maybe this is why.

Liam Julian

That's right, it does. This week's issue is out. Don't miss Mike's feature article, which argues that we need fewer chunky teachers in our public schools. Also, Eric takes to task D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, who??recently??proposed some??lousy ideas about education funding.

Not happy that the McCain campaign is using an Ed Week article he wrote last year to demonstrate Obama's thin record on education in the U.S. Senate, David Hoff pens this disclaimer on Campaign K-12:

In response to Sen. Barack Obama's education speech yesterday, the McCain campaign is circulating the following sentence I wrote in 2007:

In his eight years in the state Senate and two years in the U.S. Senate, Mr. Obama hasn't made a significant mark on education policy.

I'd like to remind the campaign that earlier this year I quoted an Arizona superintendent saying this about McCain:

I don't think he has a strong track record of putting education at the top of his priorities.

Read the Obama story and the McCain story and you can decide who has a better track record on K-12 issues.


One of Senator John McCain's most attractive virtues is his willingness to stand on principle even in the face of adversity. He promoted comprehensive immigration reform even though his own party's base hated it. He continues to support the Iraq War even though the public wants the troops out. Now, with his strong, almost-no-caveats embrace of No Child Left Behind, he's got a twofer: he's found a policy position opposed by his party's base and the general public.

Such a position gives Senator Barack Obama all kinds of room to run. He can support the tenets of NCLB while criticizing its specifics, placate his teacher union base while offering reforms that paint him as a different kind of Democrat. And yesterday, in a major policy speech at the Mapleton Expeditionary School for the Arts (MESA), that's exactly what he did. (Full text here, Washington Post Online coverage here; AP coverage here.) Here's the beef:

I believe it's time to lead a new era of mutual responsibility in education, one where we all come together for the sake of our children's success. An era where each of us does our part to make that success a