More By Author
June 08, 2011
June 09, 2011
November 05, 2008
No Child Left Behind’s “highly qualified teachers” provision deserves to die. That was so even before this week’s surprise ruling by the (oft-overturned) Ninth Circuit. The court invalidated a Bush-era regulation that allowed Teach For America participants (and other alternatively certified teachers) to be considered “highly qualified” while they worked toward full state certification. This is a huge deal—and creates a serious crisis in Ninth Circuit states—for it automatically puts schools that hire TFA teachers “out of compliance” with Title I, and would require them to send letters home within a month telling parents that their kids are being taught by unqualified teachers.
A little background might help. When Congress wrote NCLB, there was some debate about whether TFA types should be considered “highly qualified” under the law. Lawmakers essentially punted by writing confusing—you might say contradictory—language:
The term “highly qualified”—when used with respect to any public elementary school or secondary school teacher teaching in a State, means that—(i) the teacher has obtained full State certification as a teacher (including certification obtained through alternative routes to certification) or passed the State teacher licensing examination, and holds a license to teach in such State, except that when used with respect to any teacher teaching in a public charter school, the term means that the teacher meets the requirements set forth in the State’s public charter school law; and (ii) the teacher has not had certification or licensure requirements waived on an emergency, temporary, or provisional basis…
Read that passage again and ask yourself: Did Congress intend for alt-cert teachers to be considered “highly qualified,” or not? Detractors of alternative certification, including the folks who filed the case just decided by the Ninth Circuit, claim the language requires that teachers must have already obtained “full State certification,” though they can attain that “through alternative routes to certification.” Most alternative routes grant full certification after two years in the classroom and the passage of numerous ed school courses. Under this interpretation, alt-cert teachers couldn’t be deemed “highly qualified” during their first or second years on the job—in other words, during many TFA teachers’ entire tenure.
But that’s a preposterous interpretation of Congressional intent. For one, in the very same statute, Congress authorized the Transition to Teaching program which supports alternate routes to the classroom. And second, the very same Congress awarded earmark funding to Teach For America, year in and year out. This surely wouldn’t be the first time that the federal government was working at cross purposes, but it seems unlikely that Congress intended to make TFA essentially illegal.
So the Bush Administration (in which I served) published a common-sense regulation that basically declared that, if you were in a bona fide alt-cert program and working toward full certification, you could be considered “highly qualified.” And that was the regulation overturned the other day for, supposedly, contradicting the statute.
So now what? Supporters of TFA and alt cert writ-large could wait for this case to wend its way to the Supreme Court, and hope for the best. Or we could sit around and wait for Congress to reauthorize No Child Left Behind and fix the problem. But either of those approaches is apt to take years.
A better approach is to urge Congress to kill the “highly qualified teachers” provision—stat. Everyone knows it’s a meaningless designation. Nobody will defend its focus on paper credentials. The conversation has moved on to teacher “effectiveness” as measured by student learning and other meaningful indicators. Yet in the real world of real schools, HQT is still the law of the land, wreaking havoc every day. It continues to make teachers jump through unnecessary hoops. It continues to tie the hands of charter schools that have to demonstrate that their teachers have requisite “subject matter knowledge”—never mind the autonomy charters are supposed to receive. And now it’s causing material harm to Teach For America, one of the best things our education system has going.
When the education appropriations bill moves through Congress in December, some simple language could be attached. In essence: “HQT, RIP.”