Additional Topics

  1. Lots of charter school-related news today. First up, our own Chad Aldis is quoted in this piece about the status – and the process – of charter law reform in Ohio. “The most important thing is that we get this right," he says. Yup. (WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/3/15)
     
  2. Meanwhile, State Auditor Dave (with the most) Yost released a report yesterday detailing the results of a special audit of the operations of three charter school sponsors. The results, he said, “[highlight] the need for increased sponsor oversight of schools.” He also acknowledged that the sponsor-centric charter reform bill pending in the state legislature “is a step in the right direction to increase accountability and transparency in our broken system.” Yup again.  (Columbus Dispatch, 9/3/15)
     
  3. Sadly, the Auditor’s press conference got short shrift in the media due to the late-day release of tens of thousands of pages of emails and attachments from the Ohio Department of Education in regard to the flawed sponsor-rating efforts undertaken by the department earlier this year. If you are so inclined, you can check out initial coverage of the emails’ contents in the Plain Dealer (Cleveland Plain Dealer, 9/3/15) and the Dispatch,
  4. ...

The latest report from the Center for American Progress opens with a detailed effort to define the problem of truancy. The causes are myriad: Family duties and instability at home can pull students out, while bullying and zero-tolerance policies can push them in the same direction. Regardless of the reason, chronic absenteeism has consequences for students, schools, the economy, and society. The authors successfully identify the problem for readers who do not deal with it daily, as many educators do. The definition of truancy differs from state to state, while districts and schools have wide latitude to address absenteeism. Unfortunately, these factors have conspired to virtually require the development of “customized” approaches to addressing truancy when a common menu of solutions might lead to better outcomes. The report highlights successful efforts in California (defining “chronic truancy” for the first time in state law and tracking data on it statewide), Washington, D.C. (early warning and intervention program), New York City (improved data collection, incentivizing attendance), Baltimore (student-centered non-judicial “truancy court”), and Hartford (mentoring programs for students who trigger early absenteeism warnings). From there, the authors extrapolate a variety of policy recommendations applicable to the federal, state, or local levels: Develop...

  1. Proceeds from a new craft beer are earmarked to help support a cash-strapped high school band in rural central Ohio. The beer company CEO is an alum. Kudos to everyone involved and let’s hope that… Wait. What? (Columbus Dispatch, 9/2/15)
     
  2. It’s a tale of two online education programs in eastern central Ohio. First up, a profile of one teenage parent who got back on track for high school graduation and college thanks to district-run Newark Digital Academy and its staff. Says the student: “They are working to get you through school and won’t stop bugging you until you get it done.” Sounds about right. (Newark Advocate, 8/31/15) Meanwhile, the digital academy run by nearby Southwest Licking Schools is facing a student shortage. Judging by the well-meaning efforts to keep it operating, district officials see the value in it for the students they have, but if they don’t add at least five more students (up to 25) before September 15, the academy will receive no state funding for the month of October. And that would seriously test the resolve of the district to keep the program going. Why yes, this IS the same district using beer sales
  3. ...
  1. When editorials are presented in Gadfly Bites, I usually try to let them speak for themselves without too much commentary, but this editorial from Sunday’s Vindy (on the topic of the practicalities of the Youngstown Plan) is too unusual for that. First, it seems to be a direct response to questions raised in some other forum, the nature of which we outsiders are left guessing. Second, the effort of editors to assuage plan critics regarding universal EdChoice eligibility for Youngstown students is likely to cause more problems than it solves. Third, the lively discussion in the comments section regarding students with special needs is more interesting than the editorial. Fourth, this is one of the worst headlines ever. (Youngstown Vindicator, 8/30/15)
     
  2. Meanwhile, public radio took a look at the first day of school in Youngstown with the “threat of a state takeover looming”. Portentous much? (WKSU-FM, Kent, 8/28/15)
     
  3. Ohio governor John Kasich was thrown casually under the bus in the preceding piece. Editors in Toledo do the same as they opine, as if on repeat, in favor of charter law reform now. (Toledo Blade, 8/30/15)
     
  4. Kasich and his presidential run are front and center
  5. ...
  1. It’s quiet around the Statehouse these days, just like most summers. That’s probably why Innovation Ohio, the Ohio Education Association, and others held an event yesterday to trot out some old saws – charter school funding issues, charter school law reform, charter school quality, charter schools stealing kids, etc. As a response, particularly to the funding question, Chad was interviewed for this piece in the Advocate. Chad is not exactly quoted here, but his more detailed description of how school funding actually works in Ohio is laid out. (Newark Advocate, 8/28/15). Chad’s dulcet tones explain school funding directly – characterizing the Innovation Ohio description of it “not intellectually honest” – in this piece from public radio. Ouch.  Link (WKSU-FM, Kent, 8/27/15)
     
  2. The event was also covered by a number of other news outlets – remember, it’s pretty quiet over there in the Statehouse – without quoting Chad. How do you like your coverage? It ranges from ranges from bland (Gongwer Ohio, 8/27/15), to mild (Columbus Dispatch, 8/28/15), to medium (Youngstown Vindicator, 8/28/15), to hot (Toledo Blade, 8/28/15).
     
  3. In the Dispatch story, above, there is a reference to FCI Academy, a
  4. ...
  1. The state board of education this week added two of its members to the new review panel for rating charter school sponsors. (Columbus Dispatch blog, 8/24/15)
     
  2. Speaking of charter school sponsor reviews, editors in Akron opined this week in frustration about a yet-to-be-filled public records request for emails from the department. (Akron Beacon Journal, 8/24/15). Editors in Columbus opined similarly today. (Columbus Dispatch, 8/26/15). Governor Kasich’s presidential aspirations are part of both discussions.
     
  3. That currently-stalled bill which would overhaul charter school law in Ohio may not be stalled for very much longer. So says the President of the Ohio Senate. (Gongwer Ohio, 8/25/15)
     
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan School District CEO Eric Gordon gave his annual state-of-the-district report earlier this week. He reported that the Cleveland Turnaround Plan is working and cited such things as better school facilities, a strong teaching staff, more parent engagement, stabilizing enrollment, and more good preschool slots as evidence of improvement. (Cleveland Plain Dealer, 8/24/15)
     
  5. On the other coast of Ohio, Cincinnati City Schools has cancelled the famous/infamous “magnet school campouts” this year. For those of you who don’t know, this was an annual ritual in which families
  6. ...
  • Policymakers in Arkansas are granting important charter-like freedoms to traditional school districts. The regulatory waivers included exemptions from burdensome teacher licensure and class-size requirements. District officials argued that these exemptions were needed to open educational opportunities for students, particularly partnerships with local businesses and colleges. One state is cutting the red-tape for their district schools, and so should Ohio.
     
  • A small tempest is roiling the Clintonville area of Columbus as the best-performing neighborhood elementary school in the city announced that its Kindergarten and fourth grade classes were full and wait-listed resident families were informed their students would be bused to another school outside the neighborhood. Putting aside the red herring of the annex building recently razed on the site, this is actually a good problem to have, especially for the beleaguered Columbus City Schools. How they handle academic success and the predictable popularity that follows - and how neighborhood residents find peace with it - will likely be important for urban districts across the state.
  1. We’ll start today with a couple of out-of-left-field pieces which namecheck Fordham. First up, Mother Jones is talking about presidential candidate (and Ohio governor) John Kasich’s education record. Fordham’s reports on charter school quality in the Buckeye State from late 2014 are referenced. (Mother Jones, 8/24/15) The MJ piece isn’t listed as an opinion piece, although it probably ought to be. Meanwhile, the second charter school hit piece we’re looking at today is clearly marked as opinion. In it, a 16-month-old quote from Chad Aldis from the Columbus Dispatch is recycled. (Al-Jazeera America, 8/24/15)
     
  2. Back in the real world, Chad is quoted in this piece on what standardized testing will look like in Ohio in the post-PARCC era. (Port Clinton News Herald, 8/22/15) Also in other Gannett outlets.
     
  3. Here’s a couple more stories on the post-PARCC era, not quoting Chad. First up, Gongwer, which focuses on updates to the Ohio Department of Education’s website re: testing. Toledo City School’s chief academic officer is hopeful that this year’s testing protocols will go better than he says last year’s went. No clues as to who is responsible for making that hope a reality from reading
  4. ...
  1. As promised, the Ohio Department of Education will create a new charter school sponsor evaluation process after the previous version was rescinded amid complaints that e-schools’ performance were not included as part of their sponsors’ ratings. (Cleveland Plain Dealer, 8/19/15) A three-person panel was named to advise the department in creating the new evaluation process. The panel includes the superintendent of Perrysburg Exempted Village Schools. But instead of interviewing him, the Blade instead grabs a quote from a state representative who “doesn’t have much faith” in the new panel. Sorry, local supe. (Toledo Blade, 8/20/15)
     
  2. Not to worry, Perrysburg Supe, your own people love you. Or at least your district. 65% of respondents to a recent survey say that Perrysburg Exempted Village Schools deserves a grade of A. Less than 2 percent said the grade should be a D or F. This is a no-stakes poll, really, with a majority of respondents being senior citizens, but still those results have got to take the sting away a little for the boss. (Toledo Blade, 8/21/15)
     
  3. Speaking of high marks, this guest commentator – a teacher at an online charter school – opines in praise of
  4. ...

COMPILER’S NOTE: Gadfly Bites is back from its summer recess and resumes regular thrice-weekly publication today. First up, a recap of important news pieces published over the last ten days.

  1. We noted yesterday that the term “rampant uncertainty” is something of a misnomer in regard to charter schools in Ohio. There IS “rampant bad publicity” around charter schools, which isn’t new but is problematic, not only for charter school supporters but also charter haters. Case in point, this op-ed from the Toledo Blade, which must thread a fine needle in jumping on the bandwagon against charter schools (naturally) while reminding readers that some of the best schools out there are charter schools, including the Toledo School for the Arts. (Toledo Blade, 8/9/15).
     
  2. Same goes in Cleveland, where this op-ed pours together all of the charter school issues but comes out with a specific opinion against online schools, rather than against the charter sector writ large. Kudos for the Alice in Wonderland reference. (Cleveland Plain Dealer, 8/16/15)
     
  3. The state board of education and state superintendent are targets of journalistic and editorial ire under a heading that can probably be called “rampant opportunism”, no needle-threading required. Governor (and
  4. ...

Pages