Charters & Choice

Okay, it's not exactly what Rupert might condone, but since he and his crew are preoccupied and because our News Nuggets shop has plenty to do, I offer some education highlights from my weekend reading:

Charter Fights Move to the Suburbs Winnie Hu had a front-page story in the Sunday New York Times documenting a small trend in the charter movement to open more of the independent public schools in suburbs: about one in five of the nation's 5,000 charters are now in the ?burbs.? Not surprisingly, the story raises some existential questions about public education. ?Mike calls attention to the article in his Myth of the ?good? school post this morning, pointing out that ?One person's `good school' is another person's `bad fit.'? ?But there is also a ?financial question here, which is whether we can afford a good school, or even a good fit, for everyone. Is the computer the answer? Just as we citizens and taxpayers pool our resources to build common roads and ?provide for the common defense,? our ?public school system? has traditionally supposed that we get better education by having common schools. Traditionally, that has meant a central location. But if we don't need bricks and mortar to educate, do we still need a there there?

Rocketship Takes Off One of the newest charter success stories, Palo-Alto-based Rocketship Education may provide some answers.? According to Vauhini Vara of the Wall Street Journal, the the four-year old organization, which operates...

Categories: 


small child, big shoes photo

One size does not fit all.
Photo by Neeta Lind

Tension has long been visible between
charter-school proponents and some within the special-education community. The short
version goes like this: Charter schools, which are typically mission-oriented,
small, and underfunded, find it hard to service every sort of
disability within their classrooms appropriately. So they counsel some youngsters to seek other
service providers better attuned to their particular needs. This practice riles
many SPED advocates. It angers districts, too, as they are most often obligated
to educate these high-need—and often high-cost—students. We understand the
complaints, but consider the practicalities: No individual school (regular or
charter) can serve every type of disability. Large districts can
create specialized programs at particular schools (say, for students with severe autism,
or those with Down Syndrome); small districts team up with other LEAs or
“Intermediate Units” to do the same. If a school cannot provide the necessary
resources to ensure a student’s success, then that school might not be the best
place for the child and other options need to be considered. That goes for all
public schools—including charters.

South Florida charter schools admit few special needs children,”
by Kathleen McGrory and...

Categories: 

State Rep. Matt Huffman is trying to build support for a promising effort
to expand private school vouchers to more working-class families in
Ohio. In order to appease recalcitrant school districts, whose
executives vocally oppose the measure, he may remove any benefit
youngsters in wealthier districts could hope to get out of the program,
however.

Originally, the bill would have granted vouchers of up to $4,626
based on a family’s economic circumstances. But managers in more than
300 school districts have complained about the possible loss of state
and local funding, apparently afraid of competition for students’
dollars from the parochial school down the block. Huffman now wants to
limit the amount of each voucher to the total per-pupil aid the child’s
school district receives from the state. This means that children in
property-rich suburbs, where a growing number of poor families are concentrated,
could get just a few hundred bucks a year when they leave for a private
school, while many thousands of dollars stay with the school district.

It’s hard to imagine a worse trade-off: Districts get to keep the
cash without providing services, while poor and working-class parents in
the ‘burbs are forced to scrimp and save even more than their urban
counterparts to have some measure of control over their children’s
education. Choice-friendly legislators and advocacy groups in Ohio
should ask themselves, who are the state’s...

Categories: 

Recent news that White Hat, the big,
Ohio-based, profit-seeking charter school operator, faces financial problems
was surely received as an early Christmas present by many long-time charter
opponents, particularly within the Buckeye State. The company’s founder and
leader, Akron industrialist David Brennan, has been a larger-than-life-target
for school choice foes since Governor George Voinovich appointed him in 1992 to
head a commission intended to advance choice in Ohio k-12 education.

That commission’s work led to the Cleveland Scholarship Program – the nation’s
first publicly- funded voucher program. Its constitutionality would be debated
and litigated until being upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002, a decision
that has reverberated across the country.

David Brennan’s vision, doggedness and
political connectedness in the education-policy sector have not been limited to
vouchers. Without him, Ohio’s charter-school program might have been
still-born, or strangled in its crib, by the outraged forces of the
public-school establishment. From day one, the teacher unions teamed up with
the League of Women Voters, the PTA, the Ohio School Boards Association, the
Ohio AFL-CIO and others to savage charters at the statehouse, to challenge them
in the courthouse—all the way to the Ohio Supreme Court—and to denounce them in
every sort of public forum.

The vitriol of these attacks was illustrated in 2003 by then Cleveland Teachers
Union president Richard DeColibus, who announced his union’s $70,000 “truth”
campaign by...

Categories: 

Since
2005, Fordham has been working in Ohio to recruit high quality charter schools
to neighborhoods badly in need of better schools. During our six-plus years of
effort as a charter authorizer we have managed to recruit just two
high-performing models to Columbus (KIPP and a BES school). Tougher still, we
have been unable to recruit any to our home town of Dayton. We know first-hand the
challenge of helping to recruit and launch great schools. It is for this reason
that we are excited about the work of organization across the country to
accelerate the growth of great new schools through a strategic process called “charter
incubation.” 

Charter
incubators are entities that intentionally build the supply of high-quality
schools and charter-management organizations (CMOs) in cities or regions by
recruiting, selecting, and training promising leaders, and supporting those
leaders as they launch new schools. Groups leading this innovative effort
include New
Schools for New Orleans
, the
Tennessee Charter School Incubator
, Get
Smart Schools
in Colorado, Charter
School Partners
in Minnesota, The Mind Trust’s Charter School
Incubator
in Indianapolis, and 4.0
Schools
in several southeastern states.

These
organizations are united in their belief that the development of great charter
schools can be accelerated through the recruitment, selection, and development
of talented school leaders and the support of those leaders as they...

Categories: 

Fordham
has been involved in the arena of school choice in Ohio at virtually every
level for the past decade. We authorize
charter schools
, we have created charter school support organizations and
helped birth other choice-support entities, we’ve fought for choice policies in
the legislature, and Terry and Checker literally wrote
the book
on what we think are the lessons from all this work in Ohio.
Issues of school choice and the quality (or not) of urban schools have been a
big part of my professional life the last five years. Now, they are front and
center in my personal life as a parent of a 4-year old son, too. My husband and
I have to decide in the next year where our child will go to school and it is a
daunting decision.

I
live in the Columbus City School district (CCS). My husband and I bought our
home years before we had decided whether we wanted to have children, let alone
where we’d want to raise them and send them to school. Fast forward about a
decade: our son will be a kindergartner next year and we find ourselves
navigating urban school choice firsthand.

We
look forward to continuing to live in the city of Columbus and sending our son
to a district school next year. We love the diversity and energy of our
neighborhood, and...

Categories: 
The Education Gadfly

More than two million students nationwide now attend charter schools, with over 500 new charters opening this school year alone. Ensuring a strong supply of talented school leaders to serve this growing sector requires creative solutions, which is why experts from charter incubation organizations across the country came together on Wednesday for a Fordham and CEE-Trust-sponsored discussion of the incubation model and a new policy brief on the topic. Watch the video to catch up on all the conversation from “Driving Quality: Can charter incubators solve the problem of too many mediocre charter schools?

Download the policy brief, “Better Choices: Charter Incubation as a Strategy for Improving the Charter School Sector,” to learn more.

Categories: 

The twenty years since Minnesota passed the nation’s first charter school law have seen a great expansion in school choice, with charters operating in all but ten states and enrolling nearly two million students nationwide. Yet while parents now enjoy more schooling options for their children, a disappointing number of charter schools fail to provide excellent educations. As an authorizer of charter schools in Ohio, we struggle daily with birthing and growing high-quality charter schools—which is why we find promising and underutilized approaches like charter incubation so appealing.

In this policy brief, Public Impact’s Joe Ableidinger and Julie Kowal examine the merits of the incubation model, outline specific strategies for supporting it, and profile organizations around the U.S. putting it into practice. The authors explain that through the strategic recruitment, selection, and training of talented leaders—and support of them as they launch or expand new charter schools—incubators offer charter school advocates an important tool in guaranteeing quality school choice.

Fordham is the 99 percent

Special guest appearance! Terry Ryan flies in
from the Buckeye State to talk with Mike about charter incubators (using our
new report as backdrop), the striking similarity between the EU and the Common
Core, and D.C.’s school-choice initiatives. Amber dances the TUDA and Chris
believes in Santa Claus.

Better Choices coverSince 2005, Fordham has been working in Ohio to recruit high-quality
charter schools to neighborhoods badly in need of better schools. During
our six-plus years of effort we have managed to recruit just two
high-performing models to Columbus (KIPP and a Building Excellent
Schools
venture). Tougher still, we have been unable to recruit any to our home
town of
Dayton. We know first-hand just how hard it is to help recruit and
launch great
schools, especially to a Rust Belt state like Ohio. It is for this
reason that
we are excited about the work of organizations across the country to
accelerate
the growth of great new schools through a strategic process called
charter
incubation. 

Charter incubators are entities that intentionally build the
supply of high-quality schools and charter-management organizations (CMOs) in
cities or regions by recruiting, selecting, and training promising leaders, and
supporting those leaders as they launch new schools. Groups leading this
innovative effort include New
Schools for New Orleans
, the
Tennessee Charter School Incubator
, Get
Smart Schools
in Colorado, Charter
School Partners
in Minnesota, The Mind Trust’s Charter School
Incubator
in Indianapolis, and 4.0
Schools
in several southeastern states.

These organizations are united in their belief
that the development of great charter schools...

Categories: 

Pages