![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/publication/cover_images/predict-success-final-cover_0.jpg?itok=aVIwvX20)
Do Authorizer Evaluations Predict the Success of New Charter Schools?
As the sector’s gatekeepers, charter school authorizers are responsible for ensuring that schools in their purview set students up for success. But can authorizers predict which schools will meet that standard?
![Common Education Standards](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/publication/cover_images/common-education-standards-cover-image.jpg?itok=xwTnKxVv)
Common Education Standards: Tackling the Long-Term Questions
How should the "common core" state standards be governed? Who will "own" these standards (and related assessments) 20 years from now? To stir smart thinking about important aspects of these issues, the Fordham Institute invited knowledgeable experts to write background papers.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/review-draft-k-12-common-core-standards-2010-14.jpg?itok=tFPMYonM)
Review of the Draft K-12 Common Core Standards
The Fordham Institute's expert reviewers have analyzed the draft Common Core K-12 education standards (made public on March 10) according to rigorous criteria. Their analyses lead to a grade of A- for the draft mathematics standards and B for those in English language arts. Read on to find out more.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/tracking-and-detracking-2009-14.jpg?itok=nGjwxX4B)
Tracking and Detracking: High Achievers in Massachusetts Middle Schools
Brookings scholar Tom Loveless examines tracking and detracking in Massachusetts middle schools, focusing on changes that have occurred and the implications for high-achieving students. Among the findings: detracked schools have fewer advanced students in math than tracked schools and detracking is more popular in schools serving disadvantaged populations.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/2009-fsar-report-14.jpg?itok=f0tDTzQK)
Seeking Quality in the Face of Adversity: 2008-09 Fordham Sponsorship Accountability Report
As a charter school sponsor (authorizer), Fordham submits an accountability report to the Ohio Department of Education at the end of November each year. The report includes profiles of each Fordham-sponsored school, as well as graphics comparing the achievement data of our schools, their home districts, and statewide averages. You'll also find pertinent information on Ohio charter school spending over the last decade, and in the introduction, a timely analysis of the political and legislative environment impacting Ohio charters in 2008-09 that explains why the title, "Seeking Quality in the Face of Adversity," is befitting.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/stars-which-navigate-2009-14.jpg?itok=64VuaqeC)
Stars by Which to Navigate? Scanning National and International Education Standards in 2009
Expert reviewers appraise the Common Core drafts -- which outline college and career readiness standards in reading, writing, speaking and listening, and in math -- and also evaluate the reading/writing and math frameworks that undergird the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Programme for International Student Achievement (PISA). How strong are these well-known models?
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/20090908courtsinedcoverthumb4.jpg?itok=og0kodZS)
From Schoolhouse to Courthouse
From Schoolhouse to Courthouse: The Judiciary's Role in American Education examines the role of the courts in modern American K-12 education. From race to speech, from religion to school funding, few aspects of education policy have escaped the courtroom. In this book, experts describe just what the impact of judicial involvement has been. Published jointly by Fordham and Brookings Institution Press.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/20090826internationallessonsthumb4.jpg?itok=wubDf2V3)
International Lessons about National Standards
Whether the United States should embrace national standards and tests is perhaps today's hottest education issue. For guidance in addressing it, this report looks beyond our borders. How have other countries navigated these turbid waters? What can we learn from them? Expert analysts examined national standards and testing in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Russia, Singapore and South Korea.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/200907gradratedebatecoversmall4.jpg?itok=lg2OPLiV)
The Great Graduation-Rate Debate
This paper aims to promote a clearer understanding of the graduation-rate debate by distilling the policy developments and controversy surrounding the measurement of these rate. Why are there so many different ways to calculate graduation rates? How do these different rates account for the multiple pathways to graduation? What are the data sources used in the various dropout-rate calculations, and what are their pros and cons?
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/20090429apreportcover4.jpg?itok=MEhB623d)
Growing Pains in the Advanced Placement Program: Do Tough Trade-Offs Lie Ahead?
Over the past five years, the number of students taking at least one Advanced Placement exam rose by more than half. This news is celebrated but is there a downside? To find out, Fordham commissioned the Farkas Duffett Research Group to survey AP teachers in the US. The AP program remains popular with its teachers. But there are signs that the move toward "open door" access to AP is starting to cause concern.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/school-vouchers-reportthumbnail4.jpg?itok=Sdmx0t1y)
When Private Schools Take Public Dollars: What's the Place of Accountability in School Voucher Programs?
Voucher opponents often argue that it's unfair to hold public schools accountable for results under the No Child Left Behind Act and various state rules while allowing private schools that participate in school voucher programs to receive taxpayer dollars without similar accountability. In pursuit of a reasonable middle ground, we sought the advice of twenty experts in the school-choice world. This paper presents their thoughts and opinions, as well as Fordham's own ideas.
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/accountability-illusioncoverthumbnail4.jpg?itok=C8J6ijGh)
The Accountability Illusion
In this study of the No Child Left Behind Act system and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) rules for 28 states, we selected 36 real schools that vary by size, achievement, diversity, etc. and determined which ones would or would not make AYP when evaluated under each state's accountability rules. If a school that made AYP in Washington were relocated to Ohio, would it still make AYP?
![](/sites/default/files/styles/research_cover_grid_image/public/2019-02/20081215lettertopresidentthumbnail5.jpg?itok=9_n2o5Xr)
An Open Letter to President Obama, Secretary Duncan and the 111th Congress
In this exciting, unique and challenging time, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute wants to congratulate President-Elect Obama and other new federal leaders. The federal government has a key role to play in creating a world-class education system in America but it's challenging to get that role right. This letter provides some guidance. Fordham experts review the current education policy landscape and its main players and offer their view of the ideal K-12 federal role. They also address the ten big policy battles looming on the horizon. The hope is that the letter will provide critical advice, insights and ideas for the new federal education leaders who are about to take on a big job.