I've already told you that reading this letter will get you worked up, but it will also provide confirmation that Jim Shelton is, indeed, the new head of the Office of Innovation and Improvement. (I speculated as much a month ago; Russo: that's one less big job left to fill.)

For those of us who worked with Secretary of Education Rod Paige to create OII, this turn of events isn't too surprising. We always suspected that a Democratic Administration would embrace most of OII's mission (of promoting charter schools, alternative teacher certification, smart uses of technology, etc.) but would shun vouchers. And so it is.

Maybe it's just as well; school vouchers aren't that "innovative" anyway. In D.C. at least, they merely help poor kids get access to good schools that have been around for a long time. In today's education reform world, that's not enough of a "game-changer." Never mind the difference it makes for several thousand children....

So concluded the Washington Post's editorial page on Saturday with a piece aptly subtitled, "Politics is driving the destruction of the District's school voucher program."??Here's the news:

EDUCATION SECRETARY Arne Duncan has decided not to admit any new students to the D.C. voucher program, which allows low-income children to attend private schools. The abrupt decision -- made a week after 200 families had been told that their children were being awarded scholarships for the coming fall -- comes despite a new study showing some initial good results for students in the program and before the Senate has had a chance to hold promised hearings. For all the talk about putting children first, it's clear that the special interests that have long opposed vouchers are getting their way. has been??plenty more here. But if you really want to get yourself worked up, read this letter from the U.S. Department of Education's Jim Shelton and D.C. deputy mayor Victor Reinoso (both of whom deserve a strong reputation as reformers, which makes the letter all the more sickening) to the affected families. Here's the opening paragraph:

We deeply regret the confusion


The Washington Post reports??that Loudoun County, Virginia, is using the federal stimulus funds intended for schools to prop up its county budget:

After hearing that an initial batch of $11.8 million in federal funds would soon arrive in Loudoun County, supervisors slashed $7.3 million from the schools budget. They also made clear that if more federal recovery money flows to schools, schools might be asked to give back an equal amount of county dollars.

In the same article, we're reminded that Secretary Duncan has warned against this kind of "shell game":

"Where we see a state or district operating in bad faith or doing something counter to the president's intent, we're going to come down like a ton of bricks," Duncan said in a March conference call with reporters.

He didn't say "county", of course--this situation is surely complicated by Duncan's lack of direct power over Loudoun County and its purse strings. But he'd better do something before a thousand other counties follow suit.

Update (4:00 pm):??Michele McNeil's terrific Ed Week article??a few weeks back highlights this problem, primarily at the state level - she found potential shell games brewing in California,...

As Eric just reported, Loudoun County is playing games with its stimulus dollars. Specifically, it's asking schools to return county dollars and replacing them with federal dollars, presumably to help plug holes in other areas of the county's budget. The net result is that school spending is staying roughly the same. (Unlike the WaPo, which reported on the story,??I don't see the problem here, but I digress.) While Duncan has warned that these sorts of shenanigans will be dealt with swiftly and harshly, Loudoun's decision might not be such a bad thing.

Duncan made it clear that there were some serious reform strings attached to the stimulus dollars. The county is still using the feds' money and is still subject to those stipulations. But by supplanting instead of supplementing, it's not using the old trick of buying more reform with more money, which is typically how the unions and other status quo supporters have been forced into swallowing it. As Bruce Fuller explains, "[You] need bright, shiny new dollars to assuage skeptical teacher unions to experiment with merit pay." But in this case, the county has now handed Loudoun schools shiny new dollars with...

Nope, no new Department picks to withstand some reform-o-meter treatment, but a dog. A Portuguese water dog, in fact, which will shortly take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. We speculated??and we wondered and now we know: Malia and Sasha are getting their puppy at last. They've apparently named him "Bo" after "Bo" Diddley, rock n' roll great. (And (s)he is a present from Senator Ted Kennedy.) Nothing like a little bit of feel good fluff news for an early Monday morning.

The Education Gadfly

C-SPAN's archived video from Thursday's Marguerite Roza event on budget cuts and education reform is now available. Don't miss it!

As we head toward Easter Sunday, it's worth noting that hope is alive and well in the education reform world when it comes to President Obama's stimulus bill. While it's true that I don't generally share the optimism on this one, I also would prefer the optimists to be right.

I've already offered plenty of reasons to believe that the states won't be able to marshal these dollars toward meaningful reform, but here's one reason that they might: the emergence of smart, focused, passionate education reform advocacy organizations at the state level.

The best known of these include EdVoice in California and ConnCan in Connecticut, but new ones are popping up every day. These aren't think tanks. They are no-nonsense advocacy organizations that know how to drive a policy agenda.

I've gotten to know a bunch of them through our work with the Policy Innovators in Education Network, which Fordham helped to create (along with the Center for American Progress, the Center for Reinventing Public Education, and Education Sector). If anyone at the state level can figure out how to use these stimulus dollars in...

At least when you can watch Fordham's event, "Can Budget Cuts Catalyze Education Reform?" on C-SPAN right now! (And for the next 90 minutes.)

Diane Ravitch is not as enamored with mayoral control as Arne Duncan is. Read her new New York Times op-ed to see why.

Amy Fagan

Fordham's April 9 event--"Can Budget Cuts Catalyze Education Reform"--began airing on C-SPAN at 10 am this morning (watch it streaming online here or buy it on DVD here). It was a great event/discussion with featured guest Marguerite Roza from the University of Washington's Center on Reinventing Public Education. The video should be up on our website later today as well. In the meantime, you can take a look at her PowerPoint presentation and enjoy the following pictures from the event.

Marguerite Roza spoke in our conference space in downtown DC.

A C-SPAN camera focuses on Fordham President Checker Finn.

Checker Finn, left, and Dwight Holmes, Senior Policy Analyst, School Finance & Economics Unit at the National Education Association