Nestled within the General Assembly’s final budget plan as sent to Governor Kasich on June 28 was an under-the-radar provision that would have eliminated Ohio’s teacher residency program. This didn’t get a lot of coverage. Neither did Governor Kasich’s veto, which saved the program.
The limited coverage was likely a symptom of unfamiliarity: Unless you have direct contact with this program, you probably don’t know much about it. Yet the legislative change would have had a significant impact on the experiences of new Ohio teachers. Let’s examine what the residency program is and why the General Assembly should look to fix it rather than continue to seek its elimination.
Let’s start today with some statewide education news. To wit: this question. Is the state board of education ready for its close up? Let’s hope so because televised board meetings are coming soon to a modestly-watched Buckeye-centric sub-CSPAN basic cable channel near you very soon. The upside, however, is clear: it will be much easier for observers of their ridiculous shenanigans to observe and, perhaps, comment in public. Whoever that might me. (Gongwer Ohio, 7/27/17) A new statewide taskforce on educating students living in poverty met for the first time yesterday. You can read coverage of that meeting in the D if you want to, but I personally wouldn’t advise you to do so. It could lead to rage. (Columbus Dispatch, 7/27/17) Why might it lead to rage? Because according to the Gongwer coverage of same, it contained the quote which is our headline today, from an educator working in a town that I called home for a couple of years. And I was outraged. But that’s probably just me. (Gongwer Ohio, 7/27/17)
Last month, the Center for Research on Educational Options (CREDO) at Stanford University released a new analysis of the performance of charter management networks, entities that may be engaged to oversee the day-to-day operations of a charter school. (See here for a short review of the report.) As in past CREDO studies, the results showed wide variations in performance depending on several indicators: network type, state, demographics, years spent in charters by pupils, etc.
Despite dozens of analyses and myriad ways to parse the CREDO data, most of the buzz around this study has focused on the analysis of network type, by profit status. Here are four takeaways that venture beyond the flashy headlines.
1) The for-profit versus non-profit discussion needs lots of nuance. CREDO’s comparison of charters based on the profit status of their operators snatched many of the headlines. This was unsurprising, given the current political milieu and much larger rifts within the charter coalition, where “profit” seems to be playing proxy for other issues. Still, it’s simplistic at best and misleading at worst to say—as EdWeek did—“for-profit charter schools show poor academic growth.” In comparison to their nonprofit counterparts, schools overseen by...
As expected, the Lorain Academic Distress Commission on Monday chose their CEO from among the five finalists presented to the public last week. He is David Hardy Jr., who comes to Lorain from St. Louis Public Schools. He will not be on the job right away as he closes up shop in Missouri but the 90-day clock is now ticking toward the deadline for his and the ADC’s new turnaround plan. Not to mention the start of school in a month. (Northern Ohio
Not much education news to report on from the weekend. In fact, there’s very little in the following pieces that has to do with education. More about adult interests, as usual. How very sad.
As if only hearing about this CEO lark for the very first time last week, lots of folks in Lorain decided to speak up about it over the weekend. The Lorain-area NAACP prez says she is very upset with the elected school board. After last week’s theatrics, I’m sure you can guess why. (Northern Ohio Morning Journal, 7/21/17) At last week’s emergency school board reorganization meeting, Lorain’s police chief felt compelled to speak out against the ADC and its CEO search process, citing the Colossus of Lorain (a.k.a. the schmancy new-ish high school building) and some unspecified football victories as proof positive that all was well in the district. In this piece, Chiefy adds that the barely-extant Lorain Alumni Association is another sign that all is well in Lorain City Schools. (Northern Ohio Morning Journal, 7/21/17). Like the good public servant that it wants to be, the Vindy offered up dueling guest editorials on the whole ADC/CEO search situation. The argument to stop
The New Teacher Center (NTC) is a nonprofit organization that aims to improve student learning via supports for beginning teachers. In 2012, NTC got a federal i3 grant to launch a teacher induction model that provides professional development, research-based resources, and online formative assessment tools for beginning teachers, mentors, and school leaders.
The NTC model has two goals: to develop first- and second-year teachers into effective instructors and to boost their retention, particularly in schools that are hard-to-staff or serve high-poverty student populations. Toward these ends, NTC deploys full-time mentors who are carefully selected and receive 100+ hours of intensive training. New teachers meet with their mentors weekly for at least 3 hours per month and work through an NTC-created suite of research-based tools that include classroom observation cycles. Mentor coaching lasts for two years.
SRI Education recently evaluated the NTC induction model by conducting randomized controlled trials in the Broward County and Chicago Public Schools. The evaluation used both quantitative and qualitative methods and considered two aspects in particular: program implementation fidelity and teacher and student outcomes. These effects were measured over a three-year period (2013-14 to 2015-16) for two cohorts of new teachers.
We start to today with a clutch of stories from Lorain. The “realness” of the arrival of a CEO in the district seems to have caught up with the elected school board. In the wake of the “meet the candidates” night earlier this week, they have determined they are “not satisfied” with the search process. (Northern Ohio Morning Journal, 7/20/17) I'm not sure if it's the process so much as the outcome of that process, but here is what the board members say they are upset about. If you think any of this sounds familiar from the saga of the ADC in Youngstown, you would not be incorrect. Wonder if there’s a hotline? (Elyria Chronicle, 7/20/17) As you may have noticed in those earlier pieces, an emergency board meeting was called for last night following the determination of “dissatisfaction”. With no detailed agenda put forward ahead of time, we all had to wait with bated breath as to what action the board would take. So here it is: The board was reorganized so the outspoken VP (“Dissatisfactor in Chief”?) would become president, and he then changed out the board’s teacher rep sitting on the ADC. Scary. And then