External Author Name: 
Adam Emerson

It’s hard to miss Dick Morris. The former presidential aide
and Fox News contributor has raised the volume on his rhetoric during the last
couple of days to promote National School Choice Week, and Education
Sector’s Kevin Carey
was right to note that Morris does more harm to his cause
when he harangues the interests and performance of public schools so viciously.
But in an otherwise enjoyable essay for The Atlantic, Carey misses an opportunity to further explore
how the choice movement evolved to become, as he says, so ideologically
“ghettoized.” Along the way, he succeeds in guiding us only to familiar

As many do, Carey traces the movement’s roots to Milton
Friedman’s 1955 essay, “The Role of Government in Education,” but he dispatches
the left turn that school choice made in the 1970s as if it was a political
afterthought. In reality, the means-tested policies that facilitate public and
private school choice today more closely resemble the proposals from the
political left and center that surfaced between the Johnson and Reagan
administrations than anything that Milton Friedman sought to test. Greater
awareness of that history might not transform the debate, but it could help to
lift it from isolation.

The means-tested policies that facilitate public and
private school choice today more closely resemble the proposals from the
political left and center that surfaced between the Johnson and Reagan
administrations than anything that Milton Friedman sought to test.

Lost to history are the rich Chicago radio debates that took place between
Milton Friedman and Jack Coons, who was to champion the cause for equity in the
financing of public education and emerged as one of the most stalwart liberal
advocates for school choice. To Coons, the poor would show us the right way to
develop a proper test for parental choice that extended to private and
religious schools, under regulated conditions. He and colleague Stephen
Sugarman developed their centrist theory and constitutional framework in their
1978 book, Education by Choice, which drew the attention of a Democratic
congressman from California, Leo Ryan. Ryan urged Coons to draft an initiative,
saying he would raise the money and organize the campaign. This all happened,
of course, before Ryan left to investigate reports of human rights abuses at
the Peoples Temple in Jonestown, where he was murdered. Coons and Sugarman
began the campaign anyway, confident the money would somehow appear. “Both
libertarians and teachers unions laid their curse, and the thing died,” Coons
would later write.

Around that time, a newly elected Democratic senator named
Daniel Patrick Moynihan crafted a measure with Republican Senator Bob Packwood
that would have awarded up to $500 in tax credits to families paying private or
parochial school tuition. At one point, 24 Democrats and 26 Republicans in the
Senate ranging from Sen. George McGovern to Sen. Barry Goldwater signed on as
co-sponsors. Moynihan would write that, when the bill was heard, there was a
palpable strength felt in the chamber “of the views pressed upon us that this
was a measure middle-class Americans felt they had coming to them.” Even
soon-to-be elected President Jimmy Carter promised, in a campaign message to
Catholic school administrators, that he was “committed to finding
constitutionally acceptable methods of providing aid to parents whose children
attend parochial schools.” That was before Carter received the first-ever
endorsement from the National Education Association. After he took office, the
Moynihan-Packwood measure eventually fizzled.

And this flirtation with history cannot forget the
forgettable experiment at Alum Rock,
California, home to the nation’s
first test of school vouchers. Although the experiment took place under the
auspices of the Nixon administration, the project began with a team led by the
liberal Harvard social scientist Christopher Jencks. “Today’s public school has
a captive clientele,” Jencks would write in Kappan. “As a result, it in
turn becomes the captive of a political process designed to protect the
interests of its clientele.” It was that political process that eventually
doomed Alum Rock to a compromise that agreed
only to choice within public schools and guaranteed employment for the
instructional staff. Just six of the district’s 24 schools volunteered to be
the educational guinea pig. The experiment lasted just five years.

This isn’t just a trip down memory lane. What links these
initiatives is a call for equity, and that has precedence in today’s targeted
voucher and tax credit scholarship laws in Milwaukee, Florida,
and most other states that have initiated private school options for the poor
and disabled, and it has precedence in the positioning of our more innovative
educational experiments in the inner city. I wish the organizers for National
School Choice Week would do more to point to this Democratic heritage when they
highlight the areas where we see growing bipartisan support for choice today,
and I wish commentators like Kevin Carey would stop dismissing these points in
history as if they had no relevance to our dialogue today. That job might be
easier if people like Dick Morris stepped out of the spotlight for a moment.

This post also appeared on the redefinED blog.

Item Type: